Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Blake Griffin Slam Dunks: NBA Jam Style

Blogger Q&A: DawgSports

Today's Blogger Q&A was done with Mr. Sanchez of Dawgsports, SBNation's Georgia blog.

RCR: Aaron Murray is having a great season. Isaiah Crowell is averaging over five yards per carry. Yet, UGA is sitting at 1-2 on the year. What gives? Is the defense really as bad as they seem?  

DS: Actually, the defense so far may be the best thing about our team, as strange as that may seem.  Against Boise St, the offense kind of hung them out to dry all game (not a single play run in the Boise red zone).  Brandon Boykin (normally a CB) had the team's lone big play offensively in the first half.  Otherwise, it was a trade off of 3 and outs until Kellen Moore started completing passes and carved us up.  Against South Carolina, we gave up a ton of points, but a fake punt for a TD, and several defensive returns that scored or gave them very short fields, led to what would look like a bad defensive game to someone who wasn't involved and watching close.  Our defense, particularly our run defense with 6'6, 350 lb jr DL Kwame Geathers stepping up and newcomers Big Bad Jon Jenkins (another 350 lb NT) and LB transfer from Southern Cal Jarvis Jones, has been excellent.  Crowell has been the playmaker he was hyped to be, but Murray has seemed to regress so far in his sophomore year.  Our offense has made our defense seem a lot worse than they are.  Plus, another reason we're just 1-2 is we've played two really, really good teams in South Carolina and Boise St.    

Star-divide

RCR: Talk about a defensive player who doesn't get much publicity but could be a major factor in our game. Offensive?  

DS: I could answer for both with just one name, Brandon Boykin.  He doesn't fit the "much publicity" part, but he's a solid CB and after being a threat as a return man, we've designed a decent sized offensive package for him this year.  He's kind of a Champ Bailey-lite, not as good as Champ was, but just a step behind, and maybe better with the ball in his hands.  Similar, but fitting the not much pub description would be Branden Smith (like Boykin, a CB with speed and a package offensively to get him the ball in addition to punt returns).  Watch out for Geathers on the DL as mentioned above, and offensively, and redshirt freshman WR Michael Bennett has come made amazing catches showing very sticky fingers, so watch out for him as your standard "Ed McCaffery" type white guy WR making plays on 3rd downs.

 

RCR: Obviously there's a lot of talk about both of our coaches being fired this year. Do you think the talk around Richt is justified? Briefly explain why or why not.  

DS: Justified?  Absolutely.  Whether he should be or not is a different debate and tends to revolve around whether you look more at his career as a whole, or take a 'what have you done for me lately' type view.  But when your record falls that far in year 11, the talk will justifiably begin.  The answer generally depends on who you ask.  Kyle King and most dawgsports.com authors are much more in favor of Richt than I tend to be, and the other site I'm affiliated with, sportsandgrits.com takes a lot of heat for being anti-Richt.  I've been off the wagon since losing to Colorado last year, but to paraphrase Kyle from a story last week, I have hope even if I've lost my faith.

 

RCR: The Ole Miss defense struggles with quarterback runs, misdirections, and anything that could potentially be the least bit confusing. Talk a little about the Bulldog offense schematically. What is the bread and butter?  


DS: I wish I knew our bread and butter.  As said in the answer to #1, our offense has kind of been a problem.  We're supposed to be an I-set, playaction attack.  But our offensive line has been horrible getting a push for years, and our QB hasn't made a lot of good decisions, which are kind of critical in our preferred style of offense.  Right now, Crowell seems to be becoming that "bread and butter" type play in inside runs or sweeps.  We'll use the aforementioned Smith and Boykin in a lot of misdirection on reverses, in kind of Wildwhatever packages, or in some instances as a straight offensive player either slot receiver or TB.  Murray's mobile, but we don't call many plays for him to run.  Confusing seems like a good description, because even as predictable as Bobo's playbook has seemed, you'll spend much of the game with a confused look asking "why did he call that?"

 

RCR: What is the final score of Saturday's game? How does it get there?  

DS: 31-14, Georgia.  Being in Oxford gives me pause, and I respect Houston Nutt as a dangerous coach, and y'all do have some talented players.  But after losing to Vandy, and knowing that Richt, while underperforming with his talent, has brought in a lot of skill, I have a hard time seeing otherwise.  I'm not sure what threat the Rebels bring offensively, and our defense has been very stout in it's second year adapting to a 3-4.  I think our defense plays strong, our offense begins to focus around Crowell, and Boykin or Smith break off a couple big plays to make the score seem a lot easier than the game will actually be.

Comment 14 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I only read the first response...

and if I didn’t already think we were going to be slaughtered, I do now.

I’ll read the rest now since I am a masochist – as evidenced by my Ole Miss fandom.

I'm a Rebel, but I bleed the cherry and silver of the Lobos.

by Role Player on Sep 22, 2011 4:21 PM EDT reply actions  

I've always felt the same about masochism

being mandatory of Georgia basketball fans.

http://sportsandgrits.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Sep 22, 2011 8:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Only thing you have to worry about is a Houston Nutt curve ball.

And I’m not sure the program has low enough enough for that yet.

by rpmjr on Sep 23, 2011 12:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Score will be closer

Our offense will make sure you get at least 2 defensive scores. I hope not, but realistically with our OL issues your defense front will cause Murray to make some bad decisions, in turn causing a fumble and a pick. I dont think your offense will get more than 1 TD so, my prediction is 28-21 UGA. Its gonna be an ugly game, but the beauty in the stands will more than make up for the moroseness of the game.

UGA learned absolutely nothing about our team last saturday, other than CCU has a very bad team.

by SAVdawgUSAF on Sep 22, 2011 6:58 PM EDT reply actions  

Vandy scored 30+ on us. SIU scored 20+. Your offense will be fine.

Our defensive front ain’t what it is cracked up to be. Neither is our offensive front. Everybody else is bad too, but we expected that. Our lines are big disappointments.

by E4 Button on Sep 22, 2011 9:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

y'all keep saying that

forgive me if I don’t believe it. everyone has at least one good game in a year, where they look competent. I’m afraid it’s coming from you Saturday.

http://sportsandgrits.com/

by Mr. Sanchez on Sep 22, 2011 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Haha,

the fact that you think any team will look competent once is indicative of how long you’ve been a fan of a winning program. Come to our side of the fence for a couple of decades and see if you can still make that statement in good conscience.

"We’re going to turn this team around 360 degrees." –Jason Kidd

by Mexter Dccluster on Sep 22, 2011 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

I love your quote

Thats some skraight up edjumacation from Cal/UCLA, cant remember where he went to college. Dont really care to look it up.

BTW, this is a trap game if i have ever seen one. Even with 30% of the playbook removed.

by SAVdawgUSAF on Sep 23, 2011 4:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

WHOA THERE, HOOOOOOOOLD ON BUDDY!!!!!!!!!!!!

We’ve removed WAY more than 30% of our play book, pal.

/thisisOURhugeembarrassingfailure’d

by OxpatchReb on Sep 23, 2011 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't know how we could remove 30% of our playbook,

considering we only have 12 plays….Unless….they eliminated “run up the middle with Enrique”, which is at least 50% of the playbook.

"We’re going to turn this team around 360 degrees." –Jason Kidd

by Mexter Dccluster on Sep 23, 2011 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I may be violating the Temporal Prime Directive

But this is going to be UGLY. If it’s any consolation, in the 25th Century Ole Miss is known for academics and smart Georgians like Leonarde McCoy enroll at Ole Miss.

Graduated Univerity of Mississippi Leonard McCoy School of Medicine, 2481

by SkylarkThibedeau on Sep 23, 2011 12:33 PM EDT reply actions  

WOW, we're really playing the "our team sucks more than your team" game?

Well, I guess if we’re gonna win at anything, we might as well win at losing.

This is why we need a live bear mascot. Give Richt and Giggedy honey Gatorade baths, let the bear escape…problems solved for both teams.

Dude, I like Katy Perry and watch "Glee." I’m pretty much a lost fucking cause.

by Queen Hoka-Hotty-Toddy on Sep 23, 2011 1:46 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Changing the culture of Ole Miss Rebel athletics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

10728_1153363316254_3808937_n_small
MLB Rebels (Week 6)
8b0726ecf3b3e299b1fbdfefb4ec9922_small
What is former OL, Rishaw Johnson up to? (Now with the Seahawks)
10728_1153363316254_3808937_n_small
MLB Rebels (Week 4)
Bearhunt_small
Ole Miss Rebel Baseball: The Season so Far
Small
The Spring Game Up North
Small
New Verbal Commitment: JUCO DT Marquel Combs
10728_1153363316254_3808937_n_small
MLB Rebels (week 3)
Small
Hey BrandonBP, please respond.
Bearhunt_small
Ole Miss Rebel Baseball: Minor Leagues
Small
Texas A&M needs to retake Geography 101

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >