Three Things That Changed The Game: SIU
While there are often a large number of plays that decidedly impact a football game, there are almost always two to three things that really shape the game. You know. The big plays. The big stats. The battles within the game that are won or lost. Throughout football season, I will revisit three key happenings from the previous game and talk about the impact they had overall. While the chosen topics may not have ultimately decided the victor, they will always have had a profound impact on the game.
The three things which I have chosen for the SIU game are:
1. Jeff Scott's epic day
2. The defense coming up with four picks
3. SIU's quarterback runs
1. Jeff Scott's epic day
I couldn't single out one play for Scott. Obviously his 67 yard punt return was special, but everything about his first quarter could be described that way. Scott, coupled with our defense, was the reason we got up 21-0. Southern Illinois got back in the game due to a myriad of factors, but it never really mattered. The hole was too big because of Scott's sensational play early in the game. For those who weren't paying attention, he scored three touchdowns in the game's first six minutes. I'll take that average.
Scott finished with 210 total yards (118 rushing, 63 punt return, 20 kick return) and 7.4 yards per carry with three rushing touchdowns and the aforementioned return. I remarked to Whiskey Wednesday during the game's early goings that the SIU defense appeared to simply give up when Scott touched the ball. The Salukis were no doubt impressed with Jeff's speed, and it showed on several plays. Jeff Scott is going to be a very special back for us in time.
2. The defense coming up with four picks
Last year, the Rebels secured six total interceptions. Through two games this season, the team has already logged five. Anyone who watched the game on Saturday knows that a couple of the interceptions were horrendous throws, but the point is this: our team made the plays. Last year, and for many years, when opponents made poor throws, our players dropped the football or just never even saw it. This year, they're looking for the ball and getting it out of the air. There's a lot on which our defense must improve, but converting interception chances doesn't appear to be a major problem (yet).
The first interception came on a pass DE Wayne Dorsey batted into the air then managed to bring in and take to the SIU 4. Jeff Scott's job was easy, and we scored our second touchdown to go up 14-0. I would have loved to see Dorsey score there, but what came of it was just as good.
The second inerception was thrown to CB Charles Sawyer who had to go the ground for the ball. His second interception in two games, Sawyer caught the ball then stood up nonchalantly. I loved it. SIU had been able to climb back into the game before the interception, with the score at 28-10 and SIU in decent field position. Sawyer's interception took that away from them.
The Rebels failed to score on the ensuing drive but did get a punt downed at the SIU six. After a very questionable pass interference call on Charles Sawyer to give SIU a key first down, CB Marcus Temple intercepted an errant pass returned it for ten yards, then picked up a late hit penalty. The Rebels had the ball on the SIU thirteen and were able to put it in the end zone for another score to go up 35-10.
Lastly, with SIU driving and down 35-17, Damien Jackson picked off an obvious miscommunication pass. It was an awful throw, but Jackson caught it in the end zone and went down to give the Rebels the ball on their own 20. At that moment, the game was basically over.
3. SIU's quarterback runs
SIU QB Paul McIntosh is a pretty good scrambler, so I wasn't shocked to see him have success on the ground. McIntosh rushed for 80 yards on fourteen carries and frustrated me all game. When the score was 28-3 and I assumed SIU was just going to give up, McIntosh put the team on his back (doo) and carried the ball seven times on the next drive which culminated in a touchdown for the Salukis.
The Rebels simply cannot continue to allow quarterbacks to fake them out with zone-reads, misdirections, or just option opportunities. If we can't get a hold of the problem that has plagued us under Tyrone Nix's reign at defensive coordinator, we have no hope against Mississippi State or any other team who mixes in quarterback runs. They will eat us alive.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I haven't had a chance to watch Ole Miss this year yet
but I am curious if there were any big changes between the BYU game and the SIU game? Did you do anything differently or was there a focus midweek on fixing problems? Also, CJF mentioned that you guys have a three QB rotation, is that correct?
Vandy Fan. Yankee by birth, Southern by choice.
The Twitterz Tag
NickBloomfield is My Hero.
Sort of
Two QBs will play. Zack Stoudt is the regular starter, but Randall Mackey gives us more speed and comes out to run the wildcat/zone-read etc (though he has a decent arm). The biggest changes were in response to injuries moreso than schematic changes and such.
"We’re going to turn this team around 360 degrees." –Jason Kidd
by Mexter Dccluster on Sep 13, 2011 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Who do you have coming back this week?
Vandy Fan. Yankee by birth, Southern by choice.
The Twitterz Tag
NickBloomfield is My Hero.
Possibly
tailback Enrique Davis, though I don’t know how many Rebel fans are excited about it. He has the physical capacity (6-0, 220, 4.5ish) to be a stud running back, but he has a magnetic attraction to our guards’ backsides. Brandon Bolden (5-11, 215) is the one we need back, he had over 1200 yards rushing and receiving last season and powers our offense, he suffered a hairline fracture against BYU so we don’t know when he’ll be back (hopefully by UGA, likely by Alabama). Jeff Scott performed very well against SIU, but he is more of a scat back and with our regular offensive scheme, we need a big-body back who can pick up 4-5 yards in the face of contact. Our offensive scheme Saturday will depend mostly on whether Bolden or Davis will be healthy enough to play. If neither is able to go, then we’ll have to spread things around a little more.
"We’re going to turn this team around 360 degrees." –Jason Kidd
by Mexter Dccluster on Sep 13, 2011 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions
With our strength being our secondary,
do you guys feel comfortable with your QBs trying to beat us in the air or are you more prone to run the ball and control the clock? We have been pretty stout against the run so far this year but that has also had to do with the other teams not having a SEC offense to speak of. Spreads and screens may hurt us as our OLBs are still new.
Vandy Fan. Yankee by birth, Southern by choice.
The Twitterz Tag
NickBloomfield is My Hero.
We're going to try to run the ball and control the clock, most certainly.
Red Cup Rebellion - Changing the Culture of Ole Miss Athletics
Sports are chaotic and stupid; and we're bad at them.
by The Ghost of Jay Cutler on Sep 14, 2011 8:28 AM EDT up reply actions
Roughly 30% of our passes are screens.
Red Cup Rebellion - An Ole Miss Blog
Turns out that we're not very good at football.
by Juco All-American on Sep 14, 2011 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions
I particularly
liked the delayed TE screen to Moseley…
"We’re going to turn this team around 360 degrees." –Jason Kidd
by Mexter Dccluster on Sep 14, 2011 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions

by 

















