Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Masoli: It's Not Quite Aftermath

After the NCAA took the wholly unprecedented move of fitting the square peg of principles into the round hole of college football (probably could have thought of a different round hole where the NCAA could stick it), we are left with a few salient thoughts about the circumstances of the Rebels going forward, the legitimacy of the NCAA, and the sneaking suspicion that in some past life Johnny Vaught embarrassed the Norse god of mischief in some drinking game.  Most of "our" thoughts are "borrowed" from our Tweeps, 'cuz the Twitterverse is a-flutt-uh y'all.

Anyway, almost certainly minus one Samoan, it's about time to move on, so we are exorcising our demons after the jump.

Star-divide

Seen here grasping at the only true joy available to an Ole Miss fan, friend of the IT (if not of the entire Cup), @willbardwell:

Well, this isn't exactly how I envisioned it, but I do feel vindicated in my prediction that the whole Masoli thing wouldn't work out

Bardwell is right where all of our friends at NAFOOM went in the moments after this broke:  "we should have known." 

Our friend, Godfrey, deftly tweeted:

A little more clarity in the NCAA's release - they're basing this on Masoli escaping "disciplinary actions" at Oregon.  In essence, the NCAA's case re: Masoli is to prevent disciplinary "bail jumpers." If so, they should shut down the entire FCS division.

Or else, transferring is only available to criminals and chemical deviants that are ready and willing to flush their career down the toilet.  This is the kind of hypocrisy that ought to drive even crusty, old State fans to bang their keyboards until the Clarion Ledger boards are downright unreadable.  The only difference between Jeremiah Masoli, who followed every black letter rule the NCAA placed in front of him, and Darius Barksdale (or for that matter Ryan Perriloux), who followed every black letter rule the NCAA placed in front of him, is that the rule allowing transfer to FCS almost certainly kills an athlete's chances at making the NFL, so that the athlete and his bad behavior are not a P.R. black eye for the NCAA.  You have to kind of wonder whether the a boatload of Puritans and everyone responsible for the Spanish Inquisition are looking down thinking, "Geez, lay off the kid."  What it comes down to is that the NCAA doesn't care if young men (maybe whose best shot at success is their athletic talent) are closer to "thug" than "student athlete," so long as it's not national news.  We exposed the seedy hypocrisy inherent in their system - the same problems about college football being a business that self-righteous media types have been calling for years - and Jeremiah Masoli has been called on to pay the price for their fictional system of values.  Their selective hypocrisy is as shameful as it is transparent.

Neal McCready:

This is why college athletics are overrated. The NCAA plays God.

Really there is no apt metaphor to describe the way the NCAA behaves.  To say they were "playing God," would indicate that they had some real, inherent power, but they don't.  They only have the power ceded to them by a college athletics community afraid to move.  The NCAA is more like Kim Jong Il, surrounded by players far more powerful than they, but able to cause just enough chaos that those with the real power placate their grandiose vision of themselves.

My biggest problem with this decision is that no one wins.  Masoli's career gets put on hold.  Our team has been jerked around for no good reason.  And the NCAA, it appears, is getting only confused looks from the media.  The irony is that the NCAA laid down this decision, obviously, to avoid a P.R. hit that was getting laid on the only place it should have - us.

There is one person that wins - and it's not because he remains our starter - Nathan Stanley.  Everybody on the internet and beyond ought to take note at how Stanley handled what is, in retrospect, a big debacle.  I don't know if Stanley took this as the sort of hybrid challenge-opportunity that I heard about at more than one Beta Convention, but, publicly, our quarterback was all about the team and winning football games.  We want Masoli on the team because he brings a skill set that no one on the Rebel squad has.  But as for me and my house, you won't hear word one from us criticizing our long-haired, hot-momma-having Oklahoman, who acted like more of an adult through all this than any of us would have.

The biggest shame is that Stanley's maturity and this little series from OleForty:

Let's make #freeMasoli a trending topic.....

#freeMasoli #freeMasoli #freeMasoli #freeMasoli... Is not trending yet....

Despite of what happened in the past #freeMasoli #freeMasoli #freeMasoli..... It's only right.... Everybody deserves another chance.....

prove that Masoli had been brought in and accepted by our team.  I have no illusions that Houston Nutt saw this as some humanitarian third chance for Masoli.  I didn't.  But Masoli must have.  And our players did.  And if they were willing to bring him onto their team for his economic (and our entertainment) benefit, then I say the NCAA has about zero business sticking their fat noses into it.  

Comment 25 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Appeal

Any idea how many people and who are on this NCAA appeals sub-committee? The athletic dept. website gives vague reference to ‘athletic directors, faculty athletic advisors, and other adminstrators from NCAA member institutions.’

Will we actually know the identities of these people? Hell, Masoli could be seen in less than favorable light from individuals representing 20+ schools (SEC + PAC 10 members.)

by Bro. Mouzone on Aug 31, 2010 10:23 PM EDT reply actions  

maybe

but the fact that the school issued a statement saying they had no problems with him transferring and should help the committee make their decision.

Repping Ole Miss in 34 countries since 1996

by usav3t on Aug 31, 2010 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

That last sentence

Should be the rule.

Repping Ole Miss in 34 countries since 1996

by usav3t on Aug 31, 2010 10:24 PM EDT reply actions  

I hate to be Debbie Downer and continue piling shit onto this ever mounting neck deep pile of shit but...

Does anybody have the inside scoop of Kentrell Lockett? Word is he was having “tests” in Memphis and we should have been updated today, but now they fly him to OHIO?! for a “battery of tests” and we will know something soon. If they are going out for second opinions so swiftly without explanation, we could be in for more devastasting news to this calamitous day. I sure hope these tests are indeed precautionary.

by Geaux To Hell LSU on Aug 31, 2010 10:34 PM EDT reply actions  

Saw on Twitter

that he will not play vs. JSU this weekend. Not sure after that…

by AR Rebel on Aug 31, 2010 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yea, I saw he's out this weekend...

Also saw the interview with Radar discussing his visit to specialists in Ohio…Maybe I’m paranoid because of today’s events but it sure did seem like he was a little candid and hiding something…

by Geaux To Hell LSU on Aug 31, 2010 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Man, I hate to bring even more bad news....

But it is not looking good for Kentrell. Check out this article:

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5517836

To put it in perspective, he got tests in Memphis today, then was sent to the Cleveland Clinic for further testing. The Cleveland Clinic is the TOP hospital for cardiology in America. There are only two possible ways this went down:

1) He went to Memphis, the tests were fine, but due to his past history with heart issues they wanted to get him cleared by the top cardiologists in the country. (seems unlikely, no?)

2) He went to Memphis, tests showed hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or something else the docs there weren’t comfortable dealing with, and they had to send him to Cleveland for confirmation. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy would be a truly tragic turn of events for a guy like Kentrell with an NFL future ahead of him. A diagnosis of HCM would keep him from playing sports for the rest of his life.

Let’s hope things are fine. Not for our football team, but just for Kentrell’s general well-being and health.

by bball1984 on Sep 1, 2010 12:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

You may be right, but lets look at this with a historical perspective...

It’s entirely possible that they were unable to figure out what was causing the arrhythmia, but given what transpired with Benny(?) Abraham recently, the coaches decided not to risk anything at all. I’m sure the Abraham situation scared our coaches into playing every health situation safe. Furthermore, the last thing we want is the reputation of a program that doesnt protect our players’ health.
Remember that our Chancellor was the president of the American Heart Association just 2 years ago and likely has the perfect connections to quickly get Kentrell to the person who would best assess his situation. This could mean that they find something scary or it could mean that they simply are better at making a judgment call as to whether he can play and how soon he can play. Im trying to be optimistic for Kentrell’s future, because a heart is definitely not something to play with.

by EtOHReb on Sep 1, 2010 12:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

Like I said in my post, there are really only two options. Hopefully scenario one is true here, and they just sent him up there to get confirmation due to his past heart issues (and the Abraham situation, I did forget about that). It just seems unlikely. Selfishly, I obviously want him to be doing well for our football team. Most importantly, though, I want this to be figured out for his health.

by bball1984 on Sep 1, 2010 8:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good Post

You can't fax glitter....Not with that attitude.

by BhamReb on Aug 31, 2010 10:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Agree...

I think that Stanley has handled this situation as well, if not better, than most people expected him to. The competition Masoli brought could have been just what Nathan needed to up his game. I think the Rebs need to throw all of their support and belief in Stanley and move forward until we hear something from the appeals committee…

…and pray that the Wild Samoan thought our wimmens were hot enough (shouldn’t be a problem) to stay for another 365 days if this thing goes south…

by AR Rebel on Aug 31, 2010 11:07 PM EDT reply actions  

This just popped up on twitter..

DevinBritton
  
#FREEMASOLI Guy deserves a second chance. Let him play!
6 minutes ago via web
Retweeted by you and 2 others

by EtOHReb on Aug 31, 2010 11:36 PM EDT reply actions  

I feel cheated

I’m going to experience my first game at Vaught-Hemmingway this Saturday, and I was really looking forward to seeing Masoli take the field for the Rebels. I just don’t get the NCAA’s line of thinking. Masoli met all the requirements for a waiver, but they decide he can’t get one because of who he is? If anybody else had been in a similar situation, then I doubt the NCAA would denied that person clearance to play. If the standard isn’t uniform, then why bother with having a standard.

(Sigh) At least I get to enjoy the Grove.

Sic 'em Dawgs

by ClassicCityDawg on Sep 1, 2010 12:01 AM EDT reply actions  

Well said.

I guess the NCAA never counted on a player w/ good academics being kicked off a team for discipline reasons. Anyway, “capricious and arbitrary” are the NCAA’s middle name.

by hailstate on Sep 1, 2010 12:05 AM EDT reply actions  

The first point is something that a lot of people are unaware of.

So, to re-state for emphasis: Masoli had already graduated from Oregon after three undergraduate years. The guy is a good student, checkered past or not.

by The Ghost of Jay Cutler on Sep 1, 2010 8:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

If Masoli decides to leave

I won’t blame him. He came to Ole Miss because it was a mutual benefit deal. I don’t know how much we can benefit him anymore. If he hires an agent tomorrow and starts getting ready for the draft, I won’t hate.

Red Cup Rebellion - Changing the culture of Ole Miss Athletics
Destroying your traditions since [YEAR REDACTED].

by Ivory Tower on Sep 1, 2010 12:19 AM EDT reply actions  

I doubt Masoli will leave Ole Miss immediately.

Classes have already started and he—or his parents—had to pay his way since he didn’t get a scholarship. That might be a heck of a waste of money. But I definitely wouldn’t be surprised if he did leave. I hope no one was under any impression he was really at Ole Miss for the degree.

by Wild Rebel on Sep 1, 2010 1:41 AM EDT reply actions  

Yeah...about that.

What DOES one do with a parks and recreation Masters degree? I mean, I can see a bachelor degree; I assume you could work in city government, non-profits like the YMCA, National Park Service, etc. A masters just seems like showing off.

Yes, I live in Starkville...WHO did I piss off in a past life?

by Queen Hoka-Hotty-Toddy on Sep 1, 2010 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

You could start out at the GS-9 pay level in the federal government

working for the Department of the Interior, the Smithsonian, the EPA, etc. It’s not exactly the greatest thing out there, but the pay is competitive.

/federalemployee’d

by The Ghost of Jay Cutler on Sep 1, 2010 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

If memory serves

he said something about coaching football for elem aged kids? Or something like that….

by factord_agin on Sep 1, 2010 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

The good thing....

…..is that it really isn’t over till the appeal goes through. Maybe if threre is enough public opinion on the ridiculousness of the ruling, the NCAA will change their mind. Given their usual sloth-like pace, that’s not likely, but you never know.

…..Honestly, there’s plenty of hypocrisy to go around on this one. There’s the “intent” card the NCAA played, to justify a CLEARLY bogus ruling. There’s Houston Nutt saying that he brought in Masoli for “humanitarian” reasons. Yeah, right. And then there are SEC guys like me from other teams who wanted to see whether Masoli could ring up the numbers against SEC defenses. I’m not clear on WHY this ruling was made. Who benefits? Ole Miss opponents who were scared of Masoli?
 
……It would be one thing if the NCAA routinely turned down transfers for anyone in disciplinary trouble with their original school. That is definitely NOT the case here. It’s a bogus decision, and hopefully the organization realizes it and rescinds the ruling.

by Acid Reign on Sep 1, 2010 5:24 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Changing the culture of Ole Miss Rebel athletics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Andybeerme_small
We're Better Than This. Let's Keep It That Way.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Football Study Hall just posted some data
Small
DT Shackleford
Small
Bah Humbug
Dale1_small
If AK can't get it done
Spring_break_07_005__640x480__small
Minister Stricklin Address to Media for Purposes of Clarity and Openness
Ole_miss_rebels_small
Rebel Expectations
Biddle-taye_hs-06_small
It's that time of the year again
Small
Dundrecous to JSU
Small
What's that Chuck? You think OM fans need to stop bitching about Walker Jones being rumored as the next AD??? My internet hero issues a retort.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >