A Premature Plea to the NCAA
My grievances with the NCAA have been well-documented. And I am still, rightfully, pissed about that Miami thing. Nevertheless, here I am, back at their altar, offering my advice and suggestions.
If travel considerations really are something the NCAA cares about, and teams really are not seeded past the first 8 in college baseball, and creating strong inter-conference rivalries and such is recognized by the higher-ups as a good thing, then here is a humble suggestion:
Bracket Louisville against Ole Miss for a Super Regional.
For the unindoctrinated, the head coach at Louisville, Dan McDonnell, made his name as an assistant at Ole Miss. In three years at Louisville, he has won a regular season Big East title, a tournament title, and trip to the College World Series, along with three straight 40-win seasons. And, I speak only for Ivory Tower, but I am still a fan of the man.
Ole Miss and Louisville, meanwhile, look good to earn a national seed and a regional, respectively, if they can take care of business in their conference tournaments. The Rebels have a long history of performing well in the SEC Tournament, advancing to four straight finals; the Cardinals should do well in their tournament.
This would be an electric match-up with big storylines and fantastic attendance; an opportunity for Mike Bianco to "put up or shut up;" and the potential beginning of a regional inter-conference rivalry that would be interesting for both teams, so long as they retain their current skippers.
I am assured by those who know that there is some method to the madness of the NCAA - of course, that's a little like Einstein's definition of stupidity - and "storylines and drama" are not (neither should they be) the primary concern of the selection committee. However, all other things being equal, this is an opportunity to generate a great deal of excitement around these programs. This is my premature plea.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Miami Thing
I’m assuming you’re talking about getting sent to Miami last year with them being the No. 1 overall seed.
Honestly, I can’t agree that we got jobbed on that one. It took an extra inning game on the final day of the season for us to lock up an SEC tourney and NCAA regional spot in the first place. We didn’t earn the right to have a decent draw last year. Yes, we drew a tough ace in that kid from Mizzou as well, but I don’t blame that on the NCAA.
I do agree that being paired with Louisville would be a good idea, and it would make sense.
A historical correction..
We’ve advanced to 3 finals in the past 4 years…. Not 4 straight finals… We weren’t in the finals in 2007
by BrianWalker'sElbow on May 19, 2009 2:22 PM EDT reply actions
Not necessarily.
It all hinges upon pronunciation of the initial “H” sound. If you really pronounce the letter (HIStorical) then “a” is appropriate. If you really stress the “I” sound however (hIStorical), “an” is appropriate. Therefore, in writing, either is acceptable.
However, your correction is quite regal, if I do say so myself.
Take a picture, trick.
by The Ghost of Jay Cutler on May 19, 2009 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions
The -ic suffix is a stress shifter - you've just been served.
History is pronounced by some with an /h/ and by others without an /h/. And often both ways by the same people, in different contexts. And so is historical. But the -ic(al) suffix is a stress-shifter; when it’s added to a root the stress moves rightward one syllable (hístory vs históric, autómata vs automátic, térrify vs terrífic, etc). That in turn means the first syllable becomes unstressed, and in unstressed syllables in English there’s a much higher likelihood of dropping /h/.
I Googled using "historic" as opposed to "historical."
I should probably just get back to work.
Take a picture, trick.
by The Ghost of Jay Cutler on May 19, 2009 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions

by 
















